quick-xml
High performance xml pull reader/writer.
The reader:
- is almost zero-copy (use of
Cow
whenever possible) - is easy on memory allocation (the API provides a way to reuse buffers)
- support various encoding (with
encoding
feature), namespaces resolution, special characters.
Syntax is inspired by xml-rs.
Example
Reader
use Event;
use Reader;
let xml = r#"<tag1 att1 = "test">
<tag2><!--Test comment-->Test</tag2>
<tag2>Test 2</tag2>
</tag1>"#;
let mut reader = from_str;
reader.config_mut.trim_text;
let mut count = 0;
let mut txt = Vec new;
let mut buf = Vec new;
// The `Reader` does not implement `Iterator` because it outputs borrowed data (`Cow`s)
loop
Writer
use ;
use Reader;
use Writer;
use Cursor;
let xml = r#"<this_tag k1="v1" k2="v2"><child>text</child></this_tag>"#;
let mut reader = from_str;
reader.config_mut.trim_text;
let mut writer = new;
loop
let result = writer.into_inner.into_inner;
let expected = r#"<my_elem k1="v1" k2="v2" my-key="some value"><child>text</child></my_elem>"#;
assert_eq!;
Serde
When using the serialize
feature, quick-xml can be used with serde's Serialize
/Deserialize
traits.
The mapping between XML and Rust types, and in particular the syntax that allows you to specify the
distinction between elements and attributes, is described in detail in the documentation
for deserialization.
Credits
This has largely been inspired by serde-xml-rs.
quick-xml follows its convention for deserialization, including the
$value
special name.
Parsing the "value" of a tag
If you have an input of the form <foo abc="xyz">bar</foo>
, and you want to get at the bar
,
you can use either the special name $text
, or the special name $value
:
Read about the difference in the documentation.
Performance
Note that despite not focusing on performance (there are several unnecessary copies), it remains about 10x faster than serde-xml-rs.
Features
encoding
: support non utf8 xmlsserialize
: support serdeSerialize
/Deserialize
Performance
Benchmarking is hard and the results depend on your input file and your machine.
Here on my particular file, quick-xml is around 50 times faster than xml-rs crate.
// quick-xml benches
test bench_quick_xml ... bench: 198,866 ns/iter (+/- 9,663)
test bench_quick_xml_escaped ... bench: 282,740 ns/iter (+/- 61,625)
test bench_quick_xml_namespaced ... bench: 389,977 ns/iter (+/- 32,045)
// same bench with xml-rs
test bench_xml_rs ... bench: 14,468,930 ns/iter (+/- 321,171)
// serde-xml-rs vs serialize feature
test bench_serde_quick_xml ... bench: 1,181,198 ns/iter (+/- 138,290)
test bench_serde_xml_rs ... bench: 15,039,564 ns/iter (+/- 783,485)
For a feature and performance comparison, you can also have a look at RazrFalcon's parser comparison table.
Contribute
Any PR is welcomed!
License
MIT